O=C(Nc1cncc2ccccc12)C(CCc1cccc(F)c1)c1cccc(Cl)c1
O=C(Nc1cncc2ccccc12)C(CCc1ccc(F)cc1)c1cccc(Cl)c1
MIC-UNK-c66144cb-3
Duplicate of:
ALP-POS-3b848b35-4
O=C(Nc1cncc2ccccc12)C(CCC1CCCCC1)c1cccc(Cl)c1
[O-][S+](Cc1cncc2ccccc12)C(CCc1cccc(F)c1)c1cccc(Cl)c1
[O-][S+](Cc1cncc2ccccc12)C(CCc1ccc(F)cc1)c1cccc(Cl)c1
[O-][S+](Cc1cncc2ccccc12)C(CCC1CCCCC1)c1cccc(Cl)c1
Quinoline analogues of JOR-UNI-2f98d0b-12. If it turns out that amides are hydrolized, maybe sulfoxides may be worthwhile. Ureas carry come conformational penalty compared to amides (compare TRY-UNI-714a760b-12 - urea - 64µM, TRY-UNI-714a740b-6 - amide - 24µM, EDJ-MED-49816e9b-1 - other amide - 29µM) so one could expect that amides should be more potent. Sulfoxides are still more flexible.
All of these compounds can be prepared in short sequence from appropiate chalcones which in turn can be made from aldehydes and 3-chloroacetophenone. Isoquinoline part can be supplied as either 4-aminoisoquinoline or 4-chloromethylisoquinoline.