Submission Details
Molecule(s):
N=C(N)NCCC[C@H](NC(=O)CNC(=O)[C@H](Cc1ccccc1)NC(=O)[C@@H](N)CO)C(=O)O
CC(=O)N[C@@H](CO)C(=O)N[C@@H](Cc1ccccc1)C(=O)NCC(=O)N[C@@H](CCCNC(N)=O)C(N)=O
N=C(N)NCCC[C@H](NC(=O)[C@H](Cc1ccccc1)NC(=O)[C@H](Cc1ccccc1)NC(=O)[C@@H](N)CO)C(=O)O
CC(=O)N[C@@H](CO)C(=O)N[C@@H](Cc1ccccc1)C(=O)N[C@@H](Cc1ccccc1)C(=O)N[C@@H](CCCNC(N)=O)C(N)=O
N=C(N)NCCC[C@H](NC(=O)[C@H](Cc1ccccc1)NC(=O)[C@H](Cc1c[nH]c2ccccc12)NC(=O)[C@@H](N)CO)C(=O)O
CC(=O)N[C@@H](CO)C(=O)N[C@@H](Cc1c[nH]c2ccccc12)C(=O)N[C@@H](Cc1ccccc1)C(=O)N[C@@H](CCCNC(N)=O)C(N)=O
N=C(N)NCCC[C@H](NC(=O)CNC(=O)[C@H](Cc1c[nH]c2ccccc12)NC(=O)[C@@H](N)CO)C(=O)O
CC(=O)N[C@@H](CO)C(=O)N[C@@H](Cc1c[nH]c2ccccc12)C(=O)NCC(=O)N[C@@H](CCCNC(N)=O)C(N)=O
N=C(N)NCCC[C@H](NC(=O)[C@@H](CO)NC(=O)[C@H](Cc1c[nH]c2ccccc12)NC(=O)[C@@H](N)CO)C(=O)O
CC(=O)N[C@@H](CO)C(=O)N[C@@H](Cc1c[nH]c2ccccc12)C(=O)N[C@H](CO)C(=O)N[C@@H](CCCNC(N)=O)C(N)=O
N=C(N)NCCC[C@H](NC(=O)[C@@H](CO)NC(=O)[C@H](Cc1ccccc1)NC(=O)[C@@H](N)CO)C(=O)O
CC(=O)N[C@@H](CO)C(=O)N[C@@H](Cc1ccccc1)C(=O)N[C@H](CO)C(=O)N[C@@H](CCCNC(N)=O)C(N)=O
Design Rationale:
By eye. As with previously submitted peptides, targeting the dimer interface. Natural sequence is SGFR which has been submitted previously. These are alternative suggestions of SFGR, SFFR, SWFR, SWGR, SWSR and SFSR (however these last two have the unnatural D-serine) to attempt to optimise interactions with the pocket. Along with all peptides I have included a non-charged analogue. Again I have picked a random fragment id as 887 is not there.